<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Time to Drop the &#8220;M&#8221; in CRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gabmonkey.com/blog/2009/04/30/its-time-to-drop-the-m-in-crm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gabmonkey.com/blog/2009/04/30/its-time-to-drop-the-m-in-crm/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>Talking about the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:43:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why SCRM is More Powerful With CRM &#124; Gab Monkey</title>
		<link>http://www.gabmonkey.com/blog/2009/04/30/its-time-to-drop-the-m-in-crm/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Why SCRM is More Powerful With CRM &#124; Gab Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 22:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gabmonkey.com/blog/?p=207#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] social tools (think FaceBook, Twitter and LinkedIn). I
recently wrote about my own reasoning on why SCRM shouldn’t be
called SCRM and that corporations can’t “manage” customers or
expect to manage customers in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] social tools (think FaceBook, Twitter and LinkedIn). I<br />
recently wrote about my own reasoning on why SCRM shouldn’t be<br />
called SCRM and that corporations can’t “manage” customers or<br />
expect to manage customers in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

